A hierarchical scoring across 8 axes and 80 criteria, structured in two levels: blocking EU gates and differentiating FR overlay. Based exclusively on public and verifiable sources.
Intelia scores are computed algorithmically from verifiable public sources. Scores cannot be manually altered. Profiles may undergo tracked editorial enrichment, identified by the verification badges below.
Each solution receives a letter grade from A to E reflecting its overall maturity on the European digital health market.
Solutions outside the EU scope are labelled “Not evaluated” — their score is based on the average of the 8 axes.
No commercial ties with the evaluated vendors. Scores are computed from public and verifiable data.
Each criterion is backed by an official source (EUDAMED, PubMed, ANS, Bpifrance, etc.) or publicly documented.
Criteria are ordered from simplest to most demanding. A score of 7/10 means the first 7 criteria of the axis have been validated.
The Intelia scoring methodology operates on two complementary hierarchical levels:
Universal minimum criteria derived from European regulatory frameworks: MDR 2017/745, GDPR, NIS2, EHDS, AI Act. Failing any gate caps the overall score at D. The MDR/CE gate applies only to declared medical devices.
Active gates: Published GDPR policy · EU legal incorporation · EU data hosting · MDR/CE marking (if MD)
2027 bonus: AI Act · EHDS — informative today, blocking from 2027
National criteria assessing maturity on the French market. These 5 gates determine whether a solution progresses from C to B or A.
FR gates: HDS certified · Ségur v1 · ANS interop (FHIR/HL7) · ISO 13485 · ANSSI/CSPN
All scores are computed from public, verifiable sources accessible without paid subscription.
Data from automated collection (scrapers). Displayed as-is, dated, traceable to source.
The vendor has completed or corrected its data via form. Pending Intelia validation. The displayed score remains the one calculated by Intelia — declared data does not affect the score.
Data verified by the Intelia team against supporting documents. The source document is reviewed then destroyed — only the verification attestation is retained (KYC model).
Intelia applies a strict three-tier rule to ensure the reliability of displayed data.
Data is collected via scrapers from 20 verified sources (EUDAMED, PubMed, ANS, ANSSI, Bpifrance, HAS, HAL, Espacenet, EIT Health, Healthtech France and European registries). Scraped data is displayed as-is, without interpretation. It is timestamped and traceable to its source.
Listed vendors can complete their profile via a dedicated form — roadmap, pending certifications, usage context. Each contribution is verified by the Intelia team before publication. This process does not affect the score calculation, which remains algorithmic. Vendors can declare an ongoing regulatory trajectory (MDR application, HDS certification, SEGUR referencing) by providing verifiable supporting documentation. The mention 'In progress · Verified by Intelia · [date]' appears on the profile without modifying the calculated score.
A profile is considered validated only if data has been confirmed by a primary source (official publication, vendor response, regulatory database). Without validation, the displayed score remains partial and is flagged as such.
No vendor can influence its score. Criteria are public, stable and documented above. Intelia does not engage in commercial partnerships or sponsoring that could affect data.